(~);-} BE HEADY Presents ~"An EOde TO Bob Project" {-;(~)
ENTER TO WIN A 200+ Musician Signed / LEBO Painted Djembe to Plant TREES Globally
~4/20/11 to 4/20/12 ~ GOAL: $1,000,000 Raised ~ 1,000,000 Trees Planted
There are Multiple Ways to Donate Direct To Trees
~Heady Art Plants Trees in Haiti ~ FaceBook's Causes Supports India ~ FB ART Plants in the Philippines ~ Google Plants in Senegal ~ Paypal Plants Trees in Honduras
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Final Blogline requirement number 4
So I was reading my RSS feed from Slashdot and came across an article which rang tune to a Wikipedia entry I created which has come off as being biased.
I can feel the connection, because my Jam Cruise article was deleted for having a biased view with advertisement sounding mumbo-jumbo.
Titled.."Wal-mart's Wikipedia War"
Posted by Zonk on Fri Apr 28, '06 10:27 AM
This news blog feed about a news article is an argument stating "lobbyists for Wal-mart have successfully waged a war against a fair viewpoint on Wikipedia's Wal-mart page".
Basically, Walmart has been able to influence the Wikipedia with a less than nuetral viewpoint regarding their business.
The only thing I want to know is... How come Walmart can do this, but I can't even keep my Jam Cruise article around for a week?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment